Frank Ocean’s Luxurious Model Homer Sells a $25,000 C*ck Ring

Picture Supply: Getty / Jamie McCarthy

In the event you awakened at the moment pondering you would not be studying an article a few $25,000 c*ck ring, you had been mistaken. Although this outlandish intercourse toy could seem to be one thing you’d discover endorsed by Gwyneth Paltrow on Goop, it really comes completely from singer and songwriter Frank Ocean’s luxurious model, Homer.

Homer options merchandise like pennants, earring studs, rings, and belt buckles — and sure, c*ck rings. Extra particularly, one which’s 18-karat gold, made with 60 princess-cut diamonds, and retails for a little over $25,000.

The model thrust the product into the highlight in an Instagram post yesterday. The picture features a photograph of a really chiseled bare particular person sporting what seems to be a gold c*ck ring. (Don’t fret, although, the blur device is working additional time, so you do not see something too specific.) And within the caption, the model signifies that the photograph is “Frank ‘PACO’ Ocean,” although it is unclear if it is Ocean’s bundle we’re taking a look at or if Ocean is the one who took the photograph. We love a curiosity hole.

As somebody who’s been working within the sex-toy area for a while now, I’ve just a few essential questions: Why does a c*ck ring must be bedazzled with diamonds? Why does a c*ck ring must be bedazzled with something? And why does a c*ck ring must price the identical quantity as my pupil loans? The solutions are unclear.

However for individuals who are unfamiliar with the world of c*ck rings, let me clarify the absurdity of this.

First off, these toys are designed to be positioned across the base of a penis — much less for aesthetic causes and extra for pleasure functions. A c*ck ring restricts blood stream, making it in order that the particular person sporting it has a tougher time orgasming.

Some individuals put on them as a result of they do not need to orgasm too rapidly or they take pleasure in edging themselves. Different individuals put on them as a result of they like the marginally painful sensation of being restricted. In any case, you do not want diamonds across the c*ck ring to ensure that the expertise to really feel regal AF.

Let’s additionally take into account the logistics right here, as a result of it sounds messy. What if semen by some means lands on this c*ck ring? I’d suppose cum remnants would severely devalue its price and perhaps even spoil its shine. Would not that be defeating the aim of investing in a $25,000 c*ck ring? I believe sure.

And picture being on the receiving finish of this factor. I really like some clitoral motion however ideally with fingers or a vibrating toy — not, uh, diamonds. Clearly, this simply looks like a advertising ploy for Ocean to indicate off his BDE.

In the end, I perceive the aesthetics of intercourse toys are completely a part of the enjoyable. And hell, if you wish to adorn your family with bougie-ass intercourse toys, be my visitor. Even if you happen to do really need to put on it — maybe extra as jewellery and fewer as a device for higher intercourse — nothing says “my d*ck is worthy” like flexing a $25,000 c*ck ring in your penis. (Homer even sells a matching ring for your finger.)

However with regards to really utilizing and orgasming from this expensive intercourse toy, there is no must throw down that sort of money for a c*ck ring that produces the identical sensation as this one presently being sold on Amazon for $9. Belief me, your $25,000 is best spent elsewhere.

In order for you my unsolicited recommendation, there are two issues that I do know will give you extra satisfaction than any $25,000 c*ck ring can: remedy and (in case your associate has a vagina) studying “She Comes First: The Thinking Man’s Guide to Pleasuring a Woman” by Ian Kerner. You are welcome upfront.

window.fbAsyncInit = function() {
appId : ‘175338224756’,
status : true, // check login status
xfbml : true, // parse XFBML
version : ‘v8.0’
// Load the SDK Asynchronously
var id = ‘facebook-jssdk’; if (d.getElementById(id)) {return;}
if (typeof scriptsList !== “undefined”) {
scriptsList.push({‘src’: ‘’, ‘attrs’: {‘id’:id, ‘async’: true}});

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.